↓ Skip to main content

EndoLISA®: a novel and reliable method for endotoxin detection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Methods, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
EndoLISA®: a novel and reliable method for endotoxin detection
Published in
Nature Methods, September 2011
DOI 10.1038/nmeth.f.350
Authors

Holger Grallert, Sonja Leopoldseder, Maike Schuett, Peter Kurze, Bernd Buchberger

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 47 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Student > Bachelor 8 16%
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 7 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 16%
Engineering 3 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 4%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 11 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2011.
All research outputs
#14,720,232
of 22,655,397 outputs
Outputs from Nature Methods
#4,171
of 4,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,297
of 131,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Methods
#55
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,655,397 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.