↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with thoracic spinal cord injury, lesion level and rotator cuff disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Spinal Cord, January 2001
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
149 Mendeley
Title
Factors associated with thoracic spinal cord injury, lesion level and rotator cuff disorders
Published in
Spinal Cord, January 2001
DOI 10.1038/sj.sc.3101095
Pubmed ID
Authors

KA Sinnott, P Milburn, H McNaughton

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 149 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 148 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 35 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Researcher 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 5%
Other 24 16%
Unknown 33 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Engineering 15 10%
Sports and Recreations 14 9%
Neuroscience 8 5%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 38 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,566,705
of 23,079,238 outputs
Outputs from Spinal Cord
#925
of 2,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,595
of 114,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Spinal Cord
#3
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,079,238 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,345 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 114,776 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.