↓ Skip to main content

Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
686 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
601 Mendeley
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Experience-dependent plasticity of dendritic spines in the developing rat barrel cortex in vivo
Published in
Nature, April 2000
DOI 10.1038/35009107
Pubmed ID
Authors

Balazs Lendvai, Edward A. Stern, Brian Chen, Karel Svoboda

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 601 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Germany 10 2%
Portugal 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Singapore 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Other 12 2%
Unknown 545 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 175 29%
Researcher 132 22%
Professor > Associate Professor 41 7%
Student > Master 40 7%
Student > Bachelor 39 6%
Other 105 17%
Unknown 69 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 260 43%
Neuroscience 128 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 7%
Physics and Astronomy 14 2%
Psychology 14 2%
Other 53 9%
Unknown 91 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,882,501
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#71,609
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,615
of 41,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#207
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 41,985 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.