↓ Skip to main content

A Velociraptor wishbone

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 1997
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
55 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
118 Mendeley
Title
A Velociraptor wishbone
Published in
Nature, October 1997
DOI 10.1038/38918
Authors

Mark A. Norell, Peter Makovicky, James M. Clark

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 118 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 4%
Canada 2 2%
Brazil 2 2%
France 2 2%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 96 81%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 33 28%
Researcher 21 18%
Professor 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Master 10 8%
Other 27 23%
Unknown 5 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 25 21%
Chemistry 17 14%
Engineering 13 11%
Physics and Astronomy 10 8%
Other 13 11%
Unknown 6 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 August 2014.
All research outputs
#2,938,126
of 10,963,419 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#40,046
of 57,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,898
of 103,625 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#319
of 335 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 10,963,419 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 51st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,900 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 70.8. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 103,625 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 335 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.