↓ Skip to main content

Salivary protein profiling in type I diabetes using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Proteomics, March 2006
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
2 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
Title
Salivary protein profiling in type I diabetes using two-dimensional electrophoresis and mass spectrometry
Published in
Clinical Proteomics, March 2006
DOI 10.1385/cp:2:1:117
Authors

Christophe Hirtz, François Chevalier, Nicolas Sommerer, Isabelle Raingeard, Jacques Bringer, Michel Rossignol, Dominique Deville de Périere

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 26%
Other 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Researcher 2 9%
Professor 2 9%
Other 4 17%
Unknown 5 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Chemistry 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 May 2018.
All research outputs
#7,563,204
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Proteomics
#92
of 285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,923
of 72,284 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Proteomics
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,284 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them