| Title |
Nutritional access routes following oesophagectomy—a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, March 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1038/ejcn.2010.292 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
G A Markides, B Al-Khaffaf, J Vickers |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Hungary | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 48 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 6 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 54% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 4% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 October 2018.
All research outputs
#4,768,617
of 23,070,218 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1,643
of 3,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,255
of 109,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#10
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,070,218 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,877 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.