↓ Skip to main content

Infrequent CDKN2 (MTS1/p16) gene alterations in human primary breast cancer

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Cancer, October 1995
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Infrequent CDKN2 (MTS1/p16) gene alterations in human primary breast cancer
Published in
British Journal of Cancer, October 1995
DOI 10.1038/bjc.1995.442
Pubmed ID
Authors

EMJJ Berns, JGM Klijn, M Smid, IL van Staveren, NA Gruis, JA Foekens

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Master 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 14%
Unknown 2 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2010.
All research outputs
#7,561,502
of 23,065,445 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Cancer
#4,973
of 10,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,150
of 24,462 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Cancer
#20
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,065,445 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 24,462 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.