↓ Skip to main content

Activity of acetyltransferase toxins involved in Salmonella persister formation during macrophage infection

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
41 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
85 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
Title
Activity of acetyltransferase toxins involved in Salmonella persister formation during macrophage infection
Published in
Nature Communications, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41467-018-04472-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Julian A. Rycroft, Bridget Gollan, Grzegorz J. Grabe, Alexander Hall, Angela M. Cheverton, Gerald Larrouy-Maumus, Stephen A. Hare, Sophie Helaine

Abstract

Non-typhoidal Salmonella strains are responsible for invasive infections associated with high mortality and recurrence in sub-Saharan Africa, and there is strong evidence for clonal relapse following antibiotic treatment. Persisters are non-growing bacteria that are thought to be responsible for the recalcitrance of many infections to antibiotics. Toxin-antitoxin systems are stress-responsive elements that are important for Salmonella persister formation, specifically during infection. Here, we report the analysis of persister formation of clinical invasive strains of Salmonella Typhimurium and Enteritidis in human primary macrophages. We show that all the invasive clinical isolates of both serovars that we tested produce high levels of persisters following internalization by human macrophages. Our genome comparison reveals that S. Enteritidis and S. Typhimurium strains contain three acetyltransferase toxins that we characterize structurally and functionally. We show that all induce the persister state by inhibiting translation through acetylation of aminoacyl-tRNAs. However, they differ in their potency and target partially different subsets of aminoacyl-tRNAs, potentially accounting for their non-redundant effect.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 41 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 22%
Researcher 22 17%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 6 5%
Other 13 10%
Unknown 34 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 32%
Immunology and Microbiology 22 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 15%
Engineering 4 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 2%
Other 6 5%
Unknown 35 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 32. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2018.
All research outputs
#1,216,180
of 25,027,251 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#18,696
of 55,067 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,331
of 335,591 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#466
of 1,195 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,027,251 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 55,067 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,591 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,195 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.