Title |
Dust-poor galaxies at early times
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, June 2015
|
DOI | 10.1038/522422a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Veronique Buat |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 8% |
Japan | 2 | 8% |
United States | 1 | 4% |
Puerto Rico | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 19 | 76% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 21 | 84% |
Scientists | 3 | 12% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 100% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,361,447
of 22,815,414 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#35,338
of 90,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,358
of 264,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#690
of 999 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,815,414 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 999 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.