↓ Skip to main content

Toxic Metabolites of Aspergillus Flavus

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, June 1963
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
142 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
49 Mendeley
Title
Toxic Metabolites of Aspergillus Flavus
Published in
Nature, June 1963
DOI 10.1038/1981056a0
Authors

R. D. HARTLEY, BRENDA F. NESBITT, J. O'KELLY

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 49 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Denmark 2 4%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 46 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 20%
Researcher 8 16%
Student > Master 6 12%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 12 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Chemistry 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 6%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#7,559,215
of 23,058,939 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,751
of 91,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#318
of 1,589 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#11
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,058,939 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,589 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.