↓ Skip to main content

Harnessing hydrogen

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, August 2002
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
10 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
Harnessing hydrogen
Published in
Nature, August 2002
DOI 10.1038/418928a
Pubmed ID
Authors

Esteban Chornet, Stefan Czernik

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 4%
Canada 1 4%
Unknown 26 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 29%
Student > Master 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 11%
Student > Postgraduate 3 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 11%
Other 3 11%
Unknown 2 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 6 21%
Chemistry 5 18%
Environmental Science 4 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 7%
Chemical Engineering 2 7%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 4 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2014.
All research outputs
#7,558,494
of 23,056,273 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,751
of 91,439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,148
of 44,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#214
of 321 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,056,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 44,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 321 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.