Title |
Author Correction: Zika Virus in Salivary Glands of Five Different Species of Wild-Caught Mosquitoes from Mexico
|
---|---|
Published in |
Scientific Reports, May 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/s41598-018-25807-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Darwin Elizondo-Quiroga, Aarón Medina-Sánchez, Jorge M. Sánchez-González, Kristen Allison Eckert, Erendira Villalobos-Sánchez, Antonio Rigoberto Navarro-Zúñiga, Gustavo Sánchez-Tejeda, Fabián Correa-Morales, Cassandra González-Acosta, Carlos F. Arias, Susana López, Rosa María del Ángel, Victoria Pando-Robles, Armando E. Elizondo-Quiroga |
Abstract |
A correction to this article has been published and is linked from the HTML and PDF versions of this paper. The error has not been fixed in the paper. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 3 | 38% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 13% |
Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 13% |
Mathematics | 1 | 13% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2018.
All research outputs
#3,240,414
of 23,055,429 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#27,758
of 124,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,800
of 326,939 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#813
of 3,380 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,055,429 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,593 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,939 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,380 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.