↓ Skip to main content

Correction: Negative lattice expansion from the superconductivity–antiferromagnetism crossover in ruthenium copper oxides

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
Correction: Negative lattice expansion from the superconductivity–antiferromagnetism crossover in ruthenium copper oxides
Published in
Nature, October 2005
DOI 10.1038/nature04182
Pubmed ID
Authors

A. C. Mclaughlin, F. Sher, J. P. Attfield

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Librarian 1 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 25%
Lecturer 1 25%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 1 25%
Engineering 1 25%
Design 1 25%
Unknown 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2017.
All research outputs
#7,462,180
of 22,813,792 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#65,362
of 90,910 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,518
of 59,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#288
of 446 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,813,792 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,910 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,208 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 446 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.