| Title |
Clonal cell lines from the rat central nervous system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, May 1974
|
| DOI | 10.1038/249224a0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Schubert, S. Heinemann, W. Carlisle, H. Tarikas, B. Kimes, J. Patrick, J. H. Steinbach, W. Culp, B. L. Brandt |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Peru | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 71 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 24% |
| Researcher | 11 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 11% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 15 | 20% |
| Neuroscience | 12 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 19 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,346,793
of 23,299,593 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#43,706
of 92,031 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#124
of 3,900 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#6
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,299,593 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,031 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,900 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.