↓ Skip to main content

The Fate of Lipid Biosignatures in a Mars-Analogue Sulfur Stream

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
78 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
30 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
Title
The Fate of Lipid Biosignatures in a Mars-Analogue Sulfur Stream
Published in
Scientific Reports, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-25752-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jonathan Tan, James M. T. Lewis, Mark A. Sephton

Abstract

Past life on Mars will have generated organic remains that may be preserved in present day Mars rocks. The most recent period in the history of Mars that retained widespread surface waters was the late Noachian and early Hesperian and thus possessed the potential to sustain the most evolved and widely distributed martian life. Guidance for investigating late Noachian and early Hesperian rocks is provided by studies of analogous acidic and sulfur-rich environments on Earth. Here we report organic responses for an acid stream containing acidophilic organisms whose post-mortem remains are entombed in iron sulphates and iron oxides. We find that, if life was present in the Hesperian, martian organic records will comprise microbial lipids. Lipids are a potential sizeable reservoir of fossil carbon on Mars, and can be used to distinguish between different domains of life. Concentrations of lipids, and particularly alkanoic or "fatty" acids, are highest in goethite layers that reflect high water-to-rock ratios and thus a greater potential for habitability. Goethite can dehydrate to hematite, which is widespread on Mars. Mars missions should seek to detect fatty acids or their diagenetic products in the oxides and hydroxides of iron associated with sulphur-rich environments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 26 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 46%
Professor 3 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Master 2 8%
Other 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 10 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 15%
Environmental Science 3 12%
Chemistry 2 8%
Physics and Astronomy 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 645. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 August 2019.
All research outputs
#31,481
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#492
of 132,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#734
of 331,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#7
of 3,379 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 132,949 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,379 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.