↓ Skip to main content

“Down syndrome: an insight of the disease”

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Biomedical Science, June 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
227 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1143 Mendeley
Title
“Down syndrome: an insight of the disease”
Published in
Journal of Biomedical Science, June 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12929-015-0138-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ambreen Asim, Ashok Kumar, Srinivasan Muthuswamy, Shalu Jain, Sarita Agarwal

Abstract

Down syndrome (DS) is one of the commonest disorders with huge medical and social cost. DS is associated with number of phenotypes including congenital heart defects, leukemia, Alzeihmer's disease, Hirschsprung disease etc. DS individuals are affected by these phenotypes to a variable extent thus understanding the cause of this variation is a key challenge. In the present review article, we emphasize an overview of DS, DS-associated phenotypes diagnosis and management of the disease. The genes or miRNA involved in Down syndrome associated Alzheimer's disease, congenital heart defects (AVSD), leukemia including AMKL and ALL, hypertension and Hirschprung disease are discussed in this article. Moreover, we have also reviewed various prenatal diagnostic method from karyotyping to rapid molecular methods -  MLPA, FISH, QF-PCR, PSQ, NGS and noninvasive prenatal diagnosis in detail.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,143 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 1142 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 272 24%
Student > Master 95 8%
Student > Postgraduate 60 5%
Student > Ph. D. Student 51 4%
Other 44 4%
Other 138 12%
Unknown 483 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 252 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 113 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 78 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 3%
Psychology 29 3%
Other 123 11%
Unknown 509 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#2,226,645
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Biomedical Science
#82
of 1,100 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,840
of 280,836 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Biomedical Science
#1
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,100 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,836 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.