↓ Skip to main content

Publisher Correction: Genome-wide association study of delay discounting in 23,217 adult research participants of European ancestry

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Neuroscience, May 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Publisher Correction: Genome-wide association study of delay discounting in 23,217 adult research participants of European ancestry
Published in
Nature Neuroscience, May 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41593-018-0117-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sandra Sanchez-Roige, Pierre Fontanillas, Sarah L. Elson, Anita Pandit, Ellen M. Schmidt, Johanna R. Foerster, Gonçalo R. Abecasis, Joshua C. Gray, Harriet de Wit, Lea K. Davis, James MacKillop, Abraham A. Palmer

Abstract

In the version of this article initially published, the consortium authorship was not presented correctly. The 23andMe Research Team was listed as the last author, rather than the fourth, and a line directing readers to the Supplementary Note for a list of members did appear but was not directly associated with the consortium name. Also, the Supplementary Note description stated that both member names and affiliations were included; in fact, only names are given. Finally, the URL for S-PrediXcan was given in the Methods as https://github.com/hakyimlab/S-PrediXcan; the correct URL is https://github.com/hakyimlab/MetaXcan. The errors have been corrected in the HTML and PDF versions of the article.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 May 2018.
All research outputs
#9,871,840
of 17,816,628 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,895
of 4,776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,494
of 286,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#57
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,816,628 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 46.7. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.