↓ Skip to main content

Climatic dipoles drive two principal modes of North American boreal bird irruption

Overview of attention for article published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
6 news outlets
blogs
6 blogs
twitter
18 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Climatic dipoles drive two principal modes of North American boreal bird irruption
Published in
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, May 2015
DOI 10.1073/pnas.1418414112
Pubmed ID
Authors

Courtenay Strong, Benjamin Zuckerberg, Julio L. Betancourt, Walter D. Koenig

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 126 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 36 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 21%
Student > Master 15 11%
Student > Bachelor 7 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 22 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 39%
Environmental Science 35 27%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 4 3%
Unknown 28 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 89. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2020.
All research outputs
#484,921
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#8,524
of 104,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,281
of 282,753 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America
#108
of 928 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 104,451 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 282,753 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 928 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.