| Title |
Divide and conquer: strategic decision areas
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Neuroscience, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nn.4005 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nils Kolling, Laurence T Hunt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| United States | 4 | 36% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 45% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 36% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 2% |
| Estonia | 1 | 2% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 37 | 88% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 31% |
| Researcher | 10 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 14 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 26% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 7% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 5 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,648,169
of 22,803,211 outputs
Outputs from Nature Neuroscience
#3,441
of 5,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,357
of 264,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Neuroscience
#59
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,803,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,229 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 53.1. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.