Title |
Porpoises and the Bow-Riding of Ships Under Way
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature, November 1960
|
DOI | 10.1038/188700a0 |
Authors |
ANDREW A. FEJER, RICHARD H. BACKUS |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 14 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 14 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 29% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 21% |
Professor | 2 | 14% |
Student > Master | 2 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 14% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 50% |
Engineering | 2 | 14% |
Mathematics | 1 | 7% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 7% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 1 | 7% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#4,229,935
of 23,045,021 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#53,568
of 91,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98
of 1,445 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#11
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,045,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 1,445 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.