↓ Skip to main content

DNA stretching by bacterial initiators promotes replication origin opening

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Citations

dimensions_citation
171 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
268 Mendeley
Title
DNA stretching by bacterial initiators promotes replication origin opening
Published in
Nature, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/nature10455
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karl E. Duderstadt, Kevin Chuang, James M. Berger

Abstract

Many replication initiators form higher-order oligomers that process host replication origins to promote replisome formation. In addition to dedicated duplex-DNA-binding domains, cellular initiators possess AAA+ (ATPases associated with various cellular activities) elements that drive functions ranging from protein assembly to origin recognition. In bacteria, the AAA+ domain of the initiator DnaA has been proposed to assist in single-stranded DNA formation during origin melting. Here we show crystallographically and in solution that the ATP-dependent assembly of Aquifex aeolicus DnaA into a spiral oligomer creates a continuous surface that allows successive AAA+ domains to bind and extend single-stranded DNA segments. The mechanism of binding is unexpectedly similar to that of RecA, a homologous recombination factor, but it differs in that DnaA promotes a nucleic acid conformation that prevents pairing of a complementary strand. These findings, combined with strand-displacement assays, indicate that DnaA opens replication origins by a direct ATP-dependent stretching mechanism. Comparative studies reveal notable commonalities between the approach used by DnaA to engage DNA substrates and other, nucleic-acid-dependent, AAA+ systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 268 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Japan 3 1%
France 2 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Estonia 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 245 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 28%
Researcher 59 22%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 24 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 4%
Other 37 14%
Unknown 33 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 127 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 57 21%
Chemistry 21 8%
Engineering 7 3%
Physics and Astronomy 7 3%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 34 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,851,826
of 22,675,759 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#39,828
of 90,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,412
of 132,641 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#503
of 935 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,675,759 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,641 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 935 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.