↓ Skip to main content

Cas Adaptor Proteins Coordinate Sensory Axon Fasciculation

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Cas Adaptor Proteins Coordinate Sensory Axon Fasciculation
Published in
Scientific Reports, April 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41598-018-24261-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tyler A. Vahedi-Hunter, Jason A. Estep, Kylee A. Rosette, Michael L. Rutlin, Kevin M. Wright, Martin M. Riccomagno

Abstract

Development of complex neural circuits like the peripheral somatosensory system requires intricate mechanisms to ensure axons make proper connections. While much is known about ligand-receptor pairs required for dorsal root ganglion (DRG) axon guidance, very little is known about the cytoplasmic effectors that mediate cellular responses triggered by these guidance cues. Here we show that members of the Cas family of cytoplasmic signaling adaptors are highly phosphorylated in central projections of the DRG as they enter the spinal cord. Furthermore, we provide genetic evidence that Cas proteins regulate fasciculation of DRG sensory projections. These data establish an evolutionarily conserved requirement for Cas adaptor proteins during peripheral nervous system axon pathfinding. They also provide insight into the interplay between axonal fasciculation and adhesion to the substrate.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 36%
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Researcher 1 5%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 5 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Neuroscience 6 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Psychology 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 4 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2019.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#94,256
of 124,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#231,149
of 296,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,567
of 3,430 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,430 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.