↓ Skip to main content

Colloidal-quantum-dot photovoltaics using atomic-ligand passivation

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Materials, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
twitter
3 X users
patent
25 patents
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1370 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1180 Mendeley
Title
Colloidal-quantum-dot photovoltaics using atomic-ligand passivation
Published in
Nature Materials, September 2011
DOI 10.1038/nmat3118
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiang Tang, Kyle W. Kemp, Sjoerd Hoogland, Kwang S. Jeong, Huan Liu, Larissa Levina, Melissa Furukawa, Xihua Wang, Ratan Debnath, Dongkyu Cha, Kang Wei Chou, Armin Fischer, Aram Amassian, John B. Asbury, Edward H. Sargent

Abstract

Colloidal-quantum-dot (CQD) optoelectronics offer a compelling combination of solution processing and spectral tunability through quantum size effects. So far, CQD solar cells have relied on the use of organic ligands to passivate the surface of the semiconductor nanoparticles. Although inorganic metal chalcogenide ligands have led to record electronic transport parameters in CQD films, no photovoltaic device has been reported based on such compounds. Here we establish an atomic ligand strategy that makes use of monovalent halide anions to enhance electronic transport and successfully passivate surface defects in PbS CQD films. Both time-resolved infrared spectroscopy and transient device characterization indicate that the scheme leads to a shallower trap state distribution than the best organic ligands. Solar cells fabricated following this strategy show up to 6% solar AM1.5G power-conversion efficiency. The CQD films are deposited at room temperature and under ambient atmosphere, rendering the process amenable to low-cost, roll-by-roll fabrication.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 27 2%
Germany 6 <1%
France 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Belgium 3 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Other 12 1%
Unknown 1114 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 399 34%
Researcher 237 20%
Student > Master 150 13%
Student > Bachelor 77 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 48 4%
Other 148 13%
Unknown 121 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 324 27%
Materials Science 263 22%
Physics and Astronomy 195 17%
Engineering 171 14%
Chemical Engineering 29 2%
Other 53 4%
Unknown 145 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,164,975
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Nature Materials
#1,055
of 4,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,146
of 131,629 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Materials
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,027 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 131,629 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.