↓ Skip to main content

What are the impacts of reindeer/caribou (Rangifer tarandus L.) on arctic and alpine vegetation? A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Environmental Evidence, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
Title
What are the impacts of reindeer/caribou (Rangifer tarandus L.) on arctic and alpine vegetation? A systematic review
Published in
Environmental Evidence, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13750-014-0030-3
Authors

Claes Bernes, Kari Anne Bråthen, Bruce C Forbes, James DM Speed, Jon Moen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 145 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 21%
Researcher 21 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 14%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 40 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 27%
Environmental Science 32 22%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 50 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,933,475
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#77
of 333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,610
of 273,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.