| Title |
Structural basis for self-association and receptor recognition of human TRAF2
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, April 1999
|
| DOI | 10.1038/19110 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Young Chul Park, Vicki Burkitt, Anthony R. Villa, Liang Tong, Hao Wu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Sweden | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 92 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 22% |
| Researcher | 16 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Professor | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 19% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 35% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 24 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Chemistry | 5 | 5% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 9% |
| Unknown | 14 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,696,781
of 22,790,780 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#55,503
of 90,838 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,014
of 35,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#101
of 250 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,790,780 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 90,838 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.3. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 35,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 250 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.