| Title |
Experimenting with blockchain: Can one technology boost both data integrity and patients' pocketbooks?
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Medicine, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm0418-378 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Katharine Gammon |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 26% |
| Japan | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Chile | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 31 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 52 | 71% |
| Scientists | 14 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 101 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 101 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 19 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
| Researcher | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 21 | 21% |
| Unknown | 26 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 23 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 9 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 14% |
| Unknown | 34 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 251. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#143,652
of 24,990,015 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#633
of 9,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,475
of 335,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#8
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,990,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 104.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.