| Title |
Antagonism of Rho-kinase stimulates rat penile erection via a nitric oxide-independent pathway
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Medicine, January 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1038/83258 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kanchan Chitaley, Christopher J. Wingard, R. Clinton Webb, Heather Branam, Vivienne S. Stopper, Ronald W. Lewis, Thomas M. Mills |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 9 | 27% |
| Researcher | 5 | 15% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 8 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 12% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 9% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 March 2024.
All research outputs
#4,836,804
of 23,323,574 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#5,359
of 8,610 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,735
of 115,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#24
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,323,574 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,610 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 115,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.