Title |
Random semilinear system of differential equations with impulses
|
---|---|
Published in |
Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering, December 2017
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13663-017-0622-z |
Authors |
A Baliki, JJ Nieto, A Ouahab, ML Sinacer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 33% |
Ecuador | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2018.
All research outputs
#15,097,241
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#15
of 185 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,424
of 445,088 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fixed Point Theory and Algorithms for Sciences and Engineering
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 185 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,088 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them