Title |
Sickle cell disease
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nature Reviews Disease Primers, March 2018
|
DOI | 10.1038/nrdp.2018.11 |
Pubmed ID |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 65 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 10 | 15% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 8% |
Nigeria | 3 | 5% |
Mexico | 3 | 5% |
Colombia | 2 | 3% |
Brazil | 1 | 2% |
Austria | 1 | 2% |
Chile | 1 | 2% |
Finland | 1 | 2% |
Other | 5 | 8% |
Unknown | 33 | 51% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 46 | 71% |
Scientists | 11 | 17% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 9% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
Professor | 3 | 6% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 6% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Unknown | 25 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 31% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 4% |
Engineering | 2 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 4% |
Unknown | 26 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 39. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2023.
All research outputs
#1,073,088
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#385
of 798 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,873
of 353,013 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Disease Primers
#14
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 798 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,013 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.