↓ Skip to main content

CD28-mediated signalling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T-cell clones

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, April 1992
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
181 patents
wikipedia
5 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1412 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
326 Mendeley
Title
CD28-mediated signalling co-stimulates murine T cells and prevents induction of anergy in T-cell clones
Published in
Nature, April 1992
DOI 10.1038/356607a0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fiona A. Harding, James G. McArthur, Jane A. Gross, David H. Raulet, James P. Allison

Abstract

Occupancy of the T-cell antigen receptor is insufficient to induce T-cell activation optimally; a second co-stimulatory signal is required. Exposure of T-cell clones to complexes of antigen with major histocompatibility complex molecules in the absence of the co-stimulatory signal induces a state of clonal anergy. This requirement for two stimuli for T-cell activation could have an important role in vivo in establishing peripheral tolerance to antigens not encountered in the thymus. The receptor on T cells required for the co-stimulatory stimulus involved in the prevention of anergy has not been identified. The human T-cell antigen CD28 provides a signal that can synergize with T-cell antigen receptor stimulation in activating T cells to proliferate and secrete lymphokines. Here we report that a monoclonal antibody against the murine homologue of CD28 (ref. 7; J.A.G. et al., manuscript in preparation) can provide a co-stimulatory signal to naive CD4+ T cells and to T-cell clones. Moreover, we demonstrate that this co-stimulatory signal can block the induction of anergy in T-cell clones.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 326 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 317 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 84 26%
Researcher 47 14%
Student > Master 36 11%
Student > Bachelor 35 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 6%
Other 46 14%
Unknown 59 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 78 24%
Immunology and Microbiology 70 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 50 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 44 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 1%
Other 13 4%
Unknown 67 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,616,005
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#38,149
of 92,517 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#303
of 19,507 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#12
of 194 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,517 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 19,507 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 194 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.