Title |
Disease epidemic killing only US bats
|
---|---|
Published by |
Nature, January 2010
|
DOI | 10.1038/463144a |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lizzie Buchen |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 13% |
Estonia | 1 | 13% |
Germany | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 5 | 63% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 25% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 25% |
Student > Master | 2 | 25% |
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 88% |
Unknown | 1 | 13% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2018.
All research outputs
#1,109,977
of 23,023,224 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,492
of 91,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,754
of 165,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#125
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,023,224 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 91,362 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 99.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.