| Title |
Review Paleolithic nutrition revisited: A twelve-year retrospective on its nature and implications
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, April 1997
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600389 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
SB Eaton, SB Eaton, MJ Konner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
| Scientists | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 351 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 11 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Argentina | 3 | <1% |
| Denmark | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 319 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 65 | 19% |
| Student > Bachelor | 49 | 14% |
| Researcher | 47 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 46 | 13% |
| Other | 29 | 8% |
| Other | 76 | 22% |
| Unknown | 39 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 21% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 69 | 20% |
| Social Sciences | 36 | 10% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 22 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 83 | 24% |
| Unknown | 49 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 November 2023.
All research outputs
#934,026
of 25,782,229 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#357
of 4,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#258
of 30,060 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,782,229 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 30,060 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.