↓ Skip to main content

Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
twitter
21 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
90 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
Fair inclusion of pregnant women in clinical trials: an integrated scientific and ethical approach
Published in
Trials, January 2018
DOI 10.1186/s13063-017-2402-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rieke van der Graaf, Indira S. E. van der Zande, Hester M. den Ruijter, Martijn A. Oudijk, Johannes J. M. van Delden, Katrien Oude Rengerink, Rolf H. H. Groenwold

Abstract

Since pregnant women are severely underrepresented in clinical research, many take the position that the exclusion of pregnant women from research must be justified unless there are compelling "scientific reasons" for their exclusion. However, it is questionable whether this approach renders research with pregnant women fair. This paper analyzes and evaluates when research with pregnant women can be considered as fair and what constitutes scientific reasons for exclusion. Conceptual ethical and methodological analysis and evaluation of fair inclusion. Fair inclusion of pregnant women means (1) that pregnant women who are eligible are not excluded solely for being pregnant and (2) that the research interests of pregnant women are prioritized, meaning that they ought to receive substantially more attention. Fairness does not imply that pregnant women should be included in virtually every research project, as including only a few pregnant women in a population consisting only of women will not help to determine the effectiveness and safety of a treatment in pregnant women. Separate trials in pregnant women may be preferable once we assume, or know, that effects of interventions in pregnant women differ from the effects in other subpopulations, or when we assume, or know, that there are no differences. In the latter case, it may be preferable to conduct post-marketing studies or establish registries. If there is no conclusive evidence indicating either differences or equivalence of effects between pregnant and non-pregnant women, yet it seems unlikely that major differences or exact equivalence exist, the inclusion of pregnant women should be sufficient. Depending on the research question, this boils down to representativeness in terms of the proportion of pregnant and non-pregnant women, or to oversampling pregnant women. Fair inclusion of pregnant women in research implies that separate trials in pregnant women should be promoted. Inclusion of pregnant women has to be realized at the earliest phases of the research process. In addition to researchers and research ethics committees, scientific advisory councils, funders, drug regulatory agencies, pharmaceutical companies, journal editors and others have a joint responsibility to further develop the evidence base for drug use in pregnant women.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 9%
Researcher 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 73 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 15%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 15 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 4%
Social Sciences 6 4%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 73 45%