| Title |
A genome for gnetophytes and early evolution of seed plants
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Plants, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41477-017-0097-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Tao Wan, Zhi-Ming Liu, Ling-Fei Li, Andrew R. Leitch, Ilia J. Leitch, Rolf Lohaus, Zhong-Jian Liu, Hai-Ping Xin, Yan-Bing Gong, Yang Liu, Wen-Cai Wang, Ling-Yun Chen, Yong Yang, Laura J. Kelly, Ji Yang, Jin-Ling Huang, Zhen Li, Ping Liu, Li Zhang, Hong-Mei Liu, Hui Wang, Shu-Han Deng, Meng Liu, Ji Li, Lu Ma, Yan Liu, Yang Lei, Wei Xu, Ling-Qing Wu, Fan Liu, Qian Ma, Xin-Ran Yu, Zhi Jiang, Guo-Qiang Zhang, Shao-Hua Li, Rui-Qiang Li, Shou-Zhou Zhang, Qing-Feng Wang, Yves Van de Peer, Jin-Bo Zhang, Xiao-Ming Wang |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 11% |
| Japan | 7 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 8% |
| France | 3 | 4% |
| Germany | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Ireland | 2 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Unknown | 30 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 45 | 62% |
| Scientists | 25 | 34% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 244 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 244 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 51 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 41 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 24 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 20 | 8% |
| Professor | 13 | 5% |
| Other | 33 | 14% |
| Unknown | 62 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 96 | 39% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 72 | 30% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | <1% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | <1% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 6 | 2% |
| Unknown | 65 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 58. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2023.
All research outputs
#742,623
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Nature Plants
#438
of 2,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,337
of 455,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Plants
#5
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,068 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 50.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,417 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.