↓ Skip to main content

Abrupt reversal in ocean overturning during the Palaeocene/Eocene warm period

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, January 2006
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
wikipedia
11 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
154 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Abrupt reversal in ocean overturning during the Palaeocene/Eocene warm period
Published in
Nature, January 2006
DOI 10.1038/nature04386
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flavia Nunes, Richard D. Norris

Abstract

An exceptional analogue for the study of the causes and consequences of global warming occurs at the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum, 55 million years ago. A rapid rise of global temperatures during this event accompanied turnovers in both marine and terrestrial biota, as well as significant changes in ocean chemistry and circulation. Here we present evidence for an abrupt shift in deep-ocean circulation using carbon isotope records from fourteen sites. These records indicate that deep-ocean circulation patterns changed from Southern Hemisphere overturning to Northern Hemisphere overturning at the start of the Palaeocene/Eocene Thermal Maximum. This shift in the location of deep-water formation persisted for at least 40,000 years, but eventually recovered to original circulation patterns. These results corroborate climate model inferences that a shift in deep-ocean circulation would deliver relatively warmer waters to the deep sea, thus producing further warming. Greenhouse conditions can thus initiate abrupt deep-ocean circulation changes in less than a few thousand years, but may have lasting effects; in this case taking 100,000 years to revert to background conditions.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 4 1%
Canada 4 1%
France 3 1%
Belgium 3 1%
South Africa 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Other 3 1%
Unknown 275 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 68 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 55 18%
Student > Bachelor 36 12%
Professor 26 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 24 8%
Other 61 20%
Unknown 30 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 171 57%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 39 13%
Environmental Science 18 6%
Physics and Astronomy 7 2%
Social Sciences 6 2%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 37 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,386,483
of 23,567,572 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#44,186
of 92,666 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,468
of 157,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#142
of 450 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,567,572 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 92,666 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 100.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 157,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 450 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.