| Title |
Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature, November 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1038/35104644 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
J.-M. Tarascon, M. Armand |
| Abstract |
Technological improvements in rechargeable solid-state batteries are being driven by an ever-increasing demand for portable electronic devices. Lithium-ion batteries are the systems of choice, offering high energy density, flexible and lightweight design, and longer lifespan than comparable battery technologies. We present a brief historical review of the development of lithium-based rechargeable batteries, highlight ongoing research strategies, and discuss the challenges that remain regarding the synthesis, characterization, electrochemical performance and safety of these systems. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8,777 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 82 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 19 | <1% |
| Germany | 15 | <1% |
| India | 14 | <1% |
| Japan | 13 | <1% |
| Sweden | 12 | <1% |
| Canada | 8 | <1% |
| China | 7 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 6 | <1% |
| Other | 73 | <1% |
| Unknown | 8528 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1880 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 1544 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1348 | 15% |
| Researcher | 1029 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 507 | 6% |
| Other | 1222 | 14% |
| Unknown | 1247 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Materials Science | 2374 | 27% |
| Chemistry | 1468 | 17% |
| Engineering | 865 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 549 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 409 | 5% |
| Other | 1584 | 18% |
| Unknown | 1528 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 41. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#1,015,205
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#32,173
of 99,074 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#642
of 47,571 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#35
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 99,074 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 47,571 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.