RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
Enlaces a estudios sobre el tema: https://t.co/ctVQnubL4T https://t.co/eRgoZIFuau https://t.co/bpZaQSomwv
RT @joaconavajas: @eoterochio Ninguna y las dos. Promediar consensos de grupos que discutieron de manera independiente. https://t.co/wRIo…
@eoterochio Ninguna y las dos. Promediar consensos de grupos que discutieron de manera independiente. https://t.co/wRIoh1JlSC.
@patcon_ @SimonFParker @prateekbuch @edsaperia @colinmegill @PolicyLabUK @UsePolis @nesta_uk @Demos @KathyPeach @pgloor @bethnoveck @nwspk @empirica_ly @danariely @mariuchu i assume the paper they're talking about there is this https://t.co/v4NJrbqmXW
@jennifernvictor @cblatts see this thread https://t.co/GZyDXG7rGH and this paper https://t.co/p4s4aIZ02L
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
「少人数の議論から集められた知識は群衆の知恵より優れている」 https://t.co/SRC6MJpyWO
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
So, why does science work?
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
This strikes me as correct. But participants must be chosen carefully. If two participants dig in their heels, the whole process is in dsnger.
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
Also interesting. Meme competition at work.
RT @SteveStuWill: Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowd…
Disagreement is good, part 361: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. https://t.co/4VImp3657g "Remarkably, combining as few as four consensus choices outperformed the wisdom of thousands of individuals
@FBpsy @danariely Elegancia y rigor pueden ir de la mano, y siempre recomiendo los estudios de Mariano Sigman @mariuchu y todos sus colaboradores como ejemplo. Among many others, https://t.co/N1SNpkzjjQ, que con un punto de creatividad inusual en la recogi
@AndyPerfors @ShaneFs5cents @GordPennycook Andrew, I'd be interested to hear your take on cases like these, where non-independence increases the wisdom of crowds? https://t.co/zGe4j4uqtr https://t.co/IqIJa5tDWU https://t.co/oQxIegPE3c https://t.co/xsPKA9Ks
@v_hemming See e.g. https://t.co/yYNn0QRUrZ by Navajas et al., incl. @bahadorbahrami
@Eliasdebahia @camilasarasa @lanacionmas @utditella El trabajo de inteligencia colectiva es este https://t.co/fKrLxLOECm que no es de libre acceso vía el journal pero que se puede leer sin restricciones acá: https://t.co/PXilsF4cla
@KateWilton1 @GillyHx3 @jo_penberthy cognitive capacity at bare minimum aggregated stupidity doesn't yield wisdom (error of "wisdom of crowd") https://t.co/CLpkttAueU #calibrateddemocracy
Shows why betting forecasts do not equate to Wisdom of Crowds. It is the wisdom of large numbers of credible perspectives that counts for accuracy. https://t.co/PWBpOCF9Kb
Wisdom of Crowds 1.0 (applied to mkts): Though large groups of independent thinkers make better judgements than ppl on their own, large groups (like traders) herd, so it's best to think for yourself :-) WoC 2.0: Small groups of independent thinkers do bet
RT @NatureHumBehav: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. New paper by @joaconavajas…
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【平均の平均は平均より強し】エッフェル塔の高さは? FIFA南ア大会の総ゴール数は? そんな質問を1000人に訊いた平均値より、5名ずつに分かれてグループ討議した結果を平均した方が、正答に近い値が得られるそうです。今朝の『ネイチャー人間行動』…
A useful tool for "aggregating" the wisdom of small groups? https://t.co/0eXbEZhqXg
RT @CogSciSoc: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. https://t.co/aJNuzW7hjm
Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. https://t.co/aJNuzW7hjm
Today I'm trying the wisdom of crowds of crowds experiment from @joaconavajas on my students - will be fun, I'm sure! https://t.co/BiUT2URYul Also taking them through decision-making in groups using @DanBang_ comprehensive paper https://t.co/SnD4ll19FG Gr
RT @NatureHumBehav: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. New paper by @joaconavajas…
RT @NatureHumBehav: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. New paper by @joaconavajas…
RT @joshua_a_becker: Yet another paper shows the power of information exchange to improve the accuracy of group beliefs. [H/T @amaatouq ]…
Yet another paper shows the power of information exchange to improve the accuracy of group beliefs. [H/T @amaatouq ] Comm dept FTW!!! #socialscience #collectiveintelligence #businessintelligence #wisdomofcrwods #communication @AnnenbergPenn #phdlife h
RT @gaishiphd: 単純だけど、示唆は強烈。「正答」に対してAccuracyが高まるってことは、設定した正答への誘導がしやすいってことでしょ。正答なんてものが存在する世界の方が少ない https://t.co/LCfOLsnLn3
'The wisdom of crowds' is actually the wisdom of many networked small, diverse groups https://t.co/BNKmAUWc2f
https://t.co/5gQTyDNY6y Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【平均の平均は平均より強し】エッフェル塔の高さは? FIFA南ア大会の総ゴール数は? そんな質問を1000人に訊いた平均値より、5名ずつに分かれてグループ討議した結果を平均した方が、正答に近い値が得られるそうです。今朝の『ネイチャー人間行動』…
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【平均の平均は平均より強し】エッフェル塔の高さは? FIFA南ア大会の総ゴール数は? そんな質問を1000人に訊いた平均値より、5名ずつに分かれてグループ討議した結果を平均した方が、正答に近い値が得られるそうです。今朝の『ネイチャー人間行動』…
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【平均の平均は平均より強し】エッフェル塔の高さは? FIFA南ア大会の総ゴール数は? そんな質問を1000人に訊いた平均値より、5名ずつに分かれてグループ討議した結果を平均した方が、正答に近い値が得られるそうです。今朝の『ネイチャー人間行動』…
ニンゲンの知恵? https://t.co/4DNC04fZuu
RT @NatureHumBehav: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds. New paper by @joaconavajas…
RT @msjalali: Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds https://t.co/3x20D0CZAH
Aggregated knowledge from a small number of debates outperforms the wisdom of large crowds https://t.co/3x20D0CZAH
Menos burros más olotes! https://t.co/Tit2quvzwJ
Great paper! https://t.co/SWXkFuuAGg
Прикольно https://t.co/wERbMQsNuT
Wisdom of crowds vs. tyranny of the masses? #science https://t.co/FMpBnajj4Y
RT @yuji_ikegaya: 【平均の平均は平均より強し】エッフェル塔の高さは? FIFA南ア大会の総ゴール数は? そんな質問を1000人に訊いた平均値より、5名ずつに分かれてグループ討議した結果を平均した方が、正答に近い値が得られるそうです。今朝の『ネイチャー人間行動』…
Interesting article that suggests that herd mentality works best if you harness it https://t.co/1Z635wnpOj via @thetimes Read more about the experiment published in Nature Human Behaviour https://t.co/57IRuuYjSz #decisionmaking #wisdomofcrowds #groupthi