| Title |
NIH support of mobile, imaging, pervasive sensing, social media and location tracking (MISST) research: laying the foundation to examine research ethics in the digital age
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
npj Digital Medicine, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41746-017-0001-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Dunseath, Nadir Weibel, Cinnamon S. Bloss, Camille Nebeker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 57 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 33 | 58% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 9% |
| Austria | 2 | 4% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Argentina | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 47% |
| Scientists | 20 | 35% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 58 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 9 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Professor | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 9 | 16% |
| Unknown | 17 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 12% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 20 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 April 2020.
All research outputs
#1,143,144
of 25,337,969 outputs
Outputs from npj Digital Medicine
#325
of 960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,500
of 488,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from npj Digital Medicine
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,337,969 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.