↓ Skip to main content

UGA: A Third Nonsense Triplet in the Genetic Code

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, February 1967
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

1 blog
2 tweeters
3 Wikipedia pages


147 Dimensions

Readers on

69 Mendeley
1 CiteULike
UGA: A Third Nonsense Triplet in the Genetic Code
Published in
Nature, February 1967
DOI 10.1038/213449a0
Pubmed ID


Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Croatia 1 1%
United States 1 1%
China 1 1%
Unknown 66 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 26%
Researcher 13 19%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 10%
Student > Master 6 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 13 19%
Unknown 7 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 20%
Engineering 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Physics and Astronomy 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 10 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2019.
All research outputs
of 19,360,421 outputs
Outputs from Nature
of 83,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 308,711 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
of 922 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,360,421 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 83,839 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 94.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,711 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 922 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.