↓ Skip to main content

Spatiotemporal allele organization by allele-specific CRISPR live-cell imaging (SNP-CLING)

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
86 X users
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
77 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
263 Mendeley
Title
Spatiotemporal allele organization by allele-specific CRISPR live-cell imaging (SNP-CLING)
Published in
Nature Structural & Molecular Biology, January 2018
DOI 10.1038/s41594-017-0015-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp G. Maass, A. Rasim Barutcu, David M. Shechner, Catherine L. Weiner, Marta Melé, John L. Rinn

Abstract

Imaging and chromatin capture techniques have provided important insights into our understanding of nuclear organization. A limitation of these techniques is the inability to resolve allele-specific spatiotemporal properties of genomic loci in living cells. Here, we describe an allele-specific CRISPR live-cell DNA imaging technique (SNP-CLING) to provide the first comprehensive insights into allelic positioning across space and time in mouse embryonic stem cells and fibroblasts. With 3D imaging, we studied alleles on different chromosomes in relation to one another and relative to nuclear substructures such as the nucleolus. We find that alleles maintain similar positions relative to each other and the nucleolus; however, loci occupy unique positions. To monitor spatiotemporal dynamics by SNP-CLING, we performed 4D imaging and determined that alleles are either stably positioned or fluctuating during cell state transitions, such as apoptosis. SNP-CLING is a universally applicable technique that enables the dissection of allele-specific spatiotemporal genome organization in live cells.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 86 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 263 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 263 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 25%
Researcher 53 20%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Student > Master 16 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 5%
Other 34 13%
Unknown 55 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 114 43%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 60 23%
Physics and Astronomy 6 2%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 2%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 58 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 61. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2022.
All research outputs
#701,393
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#240
of 4,187 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,205
of 449,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Structural & Molecular Biology
#7
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,187 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.