RT @lowrank_adrian: Been vibin' recently to old school connectomics stuff, it's pretty crazy how similar the view was in the 80s and now, s…
Been vibin' recently to old school connectomics stuff, it's pretty crazy how similar the view was in the 80s and now, scientifically speaking. Crick's 89 "The recent excitement about neural networks" is a neat summary if you're curious https://t.co/PAb0MIp
I guess proponents of deep learning don't care about this at this point (have they ever?) but I think nothing much has changed since Francis Crick's intervention in 1989. https://t.co/qssuFzoO7t
@KordingLab Interesting commentary around this topic by Frances Crick from over 30 years ago... https://t.co/w6AKrlFAey
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
Crick’s article was a bit like the Minsky & Papert hit piece on perceptrons, IMO. He wasn’t wrong, per se, but by taking such a pessimistic perspective he discouraged important research, thereby setting science back. Important for bigwigs to remember t
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
RT @neuroecology: Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biol…
Mu-ming Poo: Back in the 80s (during the first ANN boom), Francis Crick wrote a commentary describing how ridiculous biological backprop sounds https://t.co/9g61DxKKoS So MMP went and found this prediction was exactly true! #ccbm18 https://t.co/jJX4b9ft4S
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
RT @dileeplearning: Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. h…
Francis Crick published this on Jan 12th... 29 years back! Adds a historical perspective to the @GaryMarcus debate. https://t.co/LT7SXevDSu https://t.co/cP5GEXT31h
embody some powerful general principle for handling information, expressible in a deep mathematical form, if only to give an air of intellectual respectibility to an otherwise rather low-brow enterprise." Francis Crick, 1989 https://t.co/nOraS6HpUi