| Title |
A high resolution 7-Tesla resting-state fMRI test-retest dataset with cognitive and physiological measures
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Scientific Data, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/sdata.2014.54 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Krzysztof J Gorgolewski, Natacha Mendes, Domenica Wilfling, Elisabeth Wladimirow, Claudine J Gauthier, Tyler Bonnen, Florence J.M Ruby, Robert Trampel, Pierre-Louis Bazin, Roberto Cozatl, Jonathan Smallwood, Daniel S Margulies |
| Abstract |
Here we present a test-retest dataset of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data acquired at rest. 22 participants were scanned during two sessions spaced one week apart. Each session includes two 1.5 mm isotropic whole-brain scans and one 0.75 mm isotropic scan of the prefrontal cortex, giving a total of six time-points. Additionally, the dataset includes measures of mood, sustained attention, blood pressure, respiration, pulse, and the content of self-generated thoughts (mind wandering). This data enables the investigation of sources of both intra- and inter-session variability not only limited to physiological changes, but also including alterations in cognitive and affective states, at high spatial resolution. The dataset is accompanied by a detailed experimental protocol and source code of all stimuli used. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 27% |
| United Kingdom | 8 | 13% |
| Sweden | 3 | 5% |
| Canada | 2 | 3% |
| France | 2 | 3% |
| Belgium | 2 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 3% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 13% |
| Unknown | 14 | 23% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 36 | 60% |
| Scientists | 17 | 28% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 5% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 131 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 125 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 38 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 32 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 5% |
| Other | 13 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Neuroscience | 34 | 26% |
| Psychology | 23 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 32 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2021.
All research outputs
#893,407
of 25,703,943 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Data
#361
of 3,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,623
of 361,809 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Data
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,703,943 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,809 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.