↓ Skip to main content

Revisiting tissue specificity of germline cancer predisposing mutations

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Reviews Cancer, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
Title
Revisiting tissue specificity of germline cancer predisposing mutations
Published in
Nature Reviews Cancer, January 2015
DOI 10.1038/nrc3894
Authors

John M. Maris, Alfred G. Knudson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Unknown 76 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 26 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Professor 6 8%
Student > Master 5 6%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 17 22%
Unknown 6 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 30 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Computer Science 2 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 10 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2015.
All research outputs
#1,518,050
of 15,466,176 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#589
of 2,037 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,328
of 286,529 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#18
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,466,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,037 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,529 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.