| Title |
Revisiting tissue specificity of germline cancer predisposing mutations
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cancer, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrc3894 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John M. Maris, Alfred G. Knudson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 29% |
| Brazil | 1 | 14% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
| Spain | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 86 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 83 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 6 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 20 | 23% |
| Unknown | 10 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 36% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 16% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 13 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2015.
All research outputs
#2,413,338
of 22,778,347 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#814
of 2,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,564
of 352,360 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#19
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,778,347 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,360 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.