↓ Skip to main content

Targeted and genome-wide sequencing reveal single nucleotide variations impacting specificity of Cas9 in human stem cells

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
4 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
19 X users
patent
2 patents
weibo
1 weibo user
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
128 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
271 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Targeted and genome-wide sequencing reveal single nucleotide variations impacting specificity of Cas9 in human stem cells
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/ncomms6507
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luhan Yang, Dennis Grishin, Gang Wang, John Aach, Cheng-Zhong Zhang, Raj Chari, Jason Homsy, Xuyu Cai, Yue Zhao, Jian-Bing Fan, Christine Seidman, Jonathan Seidman, William Pu, George Church

Abstract

CRISPR/Cas9 has demonstrated a high-efficiency in site-specific gene targeting. However, potential off-target effects of the Cas9 nuclease represent a major safety concern for any therapeutic application. Here, we knock out the Tafazzin gene by CRISPR/Cas9 in human-induced pluripotent stem cells with 54% efficiency. We combine whole-genome sequencing and deep-targeted sequencing to characterise the off-target effects of Cas9 editing. Whole-genome sequencing of Cas9-modified hiPSC clones detects neither gross genomic alterations nor elevated mutation rates. Deep sequencing of in silico predicted off-target sites in a population of Cas9-treated cells further confirms high specificity of Cas9. However, we identify a single high-efficiency off-target site that is generated by a common germline single-nucleotide variant (SNV) in our experiment. Based on in silico analysis, we estimate a likelihood of SNVs creating off-target sites in a human genome to be ~1.5-8.5%, depending on the genome and site-selection method, but also note that mutations might be generated at these sites only at low rates and may not have functional consequences. Our study demonstrates the feasibility of highly specific clonal ex vivo gene editing using CRISPR/Cas9 and highlights the value of whole-genome sequencing before personalised CRISPR design.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 271 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 2%
Brazil 2 <1%
China 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 259 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 72 27%
Researcher 60 22%
Student > Master 25 9%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 16 6%
Other 35 13%
Unknown 43 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 103 38%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 71 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 18 7%
Engineering 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 2%
Other 15 6%
Unknown 49 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2022.
All research outputs
#543,368
of 24,598,501 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#9,351
of 53,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,722
of 372,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#81
of 692 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,598,501 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 53,069 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 56.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 692 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.