↓ Skip to main content

Characterizing a thermostable Cas9 for bacterial genome editing and silencing

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Communications, November 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
48 X users
patent
20 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
117 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
266 Mendeley
Title
Characterizing a thermostable Cas9 for bacterial genome editing and silencing
Published in
Nature Communications, November 2017
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-01591-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ioannis Mougiakos, Prarthana Mohanraju, Elleke F. Bosma, Valentijn Vrouwe, Max Finger Bou, Mihris I. S. Naduthodi, Alex Gussak, Rudolf B. L. Brinkman, Richard van Kranenburg, John van der Oost

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas9-based genome engineering tools have revolutionized fundamental research and biotechnological exploitation of both eukaryotes and prokaryotes. However, the mesophilic nature of the established Cas9 systems does not allow for applications that require enhanced stability, including engineering at elevated temperatures. Here we identify and characterize ThermoCas9 from the thermophilic bacterium Geobacillus thermodenitrificans T12. We show that in vitro ThermoCas9 is active between 20 and 70 °C, has stringent PAM-preference at lower temperatures, tolerates fewer spacer-protospacer mismatches than SpCas9 and its activity at elevated temperatures depends on the sgRNA-structure. We develop ThermoCas9-based engineering tools for gene deletion and transcriptional silencing at 55 °C in Bacillus smithii and for gene deletion at 37 °C in Pseudomonas putida. Altogether, our findings provide fundamental insights into a thermophilic CRISPR-Cas family member and establish a Cas9-based bacterial genome editing and silencing tool with a broad temperature range.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 48 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 266 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 266 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 18%
Researcher 46 17%
Student > Master 41 15%
Student > Bachelor 34 13%
Other 10 4%
Other 25 9%
Unknown 61 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 105 39%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 48 18%
Engineering 9 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 3%
Chemical Engineering 7 3%
Other 17 6%
Unknown 72 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 31. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 March 2024.
All research outputs
#1,278,688
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Nature Communications
#19,529
of 56,857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,585
of 445,543 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Communications
#556
of 1,483 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 56,857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 55.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,543 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,483 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.