↓ Skip to main content

Identification of a novel human deoxynivalenol metabolite enhancing proliferation of intestinal and urinary bladder cells

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, September 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
Title
Identification of a novel human deoxynivalenol metabolite enhancing proliferation of intestinal and urinary bladder cells
Published in
Scientific Reports, September 2016
DOI 10.1038/srep33854
Pubmed ID
Authors

Benedikt Warth, Giorgia Del Favero, Gerlinde Wiesenberger, Hannes Puntscher, Lydia Woelflingseder, Philipp Fruhmann, Bojan Sarkanj, Rudolf Krska, Rainer Schuhmacher, Gerhard Adam, Doris Marko

Abstract

The mycotoxin deoxynivalenol (DON) is an abundant contaminant of cereal based food and a severe issue for global food safety. We report the discovery of DON-3-sulfate as a novel human metabolite and potential new biomarker of DON exposure. The conjugate was detectable in 70% of urine samples obtained from pregnant women in Croatia. For the measurement of urinary metabolites, a highly sensitive and selective LC-MS/MS method was developed and validated. The method was also used to investigate samples from a duplicate diet survey for studying the toxicokinetics of DON-3-sulfate. To get a preliminary insight into the biological relevance of the newly discovered DON-sulfates, in vitroexperiments were performed. In contrast to DON, sulfate conjugates lacked potency to suppress protein translation. However, surprisingly we found that DON-sulfates enhanced proliferation of human HT-29 colon carcinoma cells, primary human colon epithelial cells (HCEC-1CT) and, to some extent, also T24 bladder cancer cells. A proliferative stimulus, especially in tumorigenic cells raises concern on the potential impact of DON-sulfates on consumer health. Thus, a further characterization of their toxicological relevance should be of high priority.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Portugal 1 2%
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 62 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Student > Master 4 6%
Professor 2 3%
Other 8 12%
Unknown 16 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 14 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 11%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 23 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2018.
All research outputs
#18,576,855
of 23,008,860 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#94,081
of 124,271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245,067
of 322,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#2,634
of 3,514 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,008,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 124,271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,268 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,514 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.