| Title |
Predictable response: Finding optimal drugs and doses using artificial intelligence
|
|---|---|
| Published by |
Nature Medicine, November 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nm1117-1244 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shraddha Chakradhar |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 214 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 30% |
| Canada | 7 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 3% |
| India | 5 | 2% |
| Australia | 4 | 2% |
| Slovenia | 4 | 2% |
| Spain | 3 | 1% |
| France | 3 | 1% |
| South Africa | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 85 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 142 | 66% |
| Scientists | 50 | 23% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 7% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 21% |
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 9 | 12% |
| Engineering | 8 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 19 | 24% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 125. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2018.
All research outputs
#338,950
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Nature Medicine
#1,240
of 9,412 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,070
of 341,778 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Medicine
#12
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,412 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 105.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,778 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.