↓ Skip to main content

Life cycles, fitness decoupling and the evolution of multicellularity

Overview of attention for article published in Nature, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
187 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
531 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
Title
Life cycles, fitness decoupling and the evolution of multicellularity
Published in
Nature, November 2014
DOI 10.1038/nature13884
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrin Hammerschmidt, Caroline J. Rose, Benjamin Kerr, Paul B. Rainey

Abstract

Cooperation is central to the emergence of multicellular life; however, the means by which the earliest collectives (groups of cells) maintained integrity in the face of destructive cheating types is unclear. One idea posits cheats as a primitive germ line in a life cycle that facilitates collective reproduction. Here we describe an experiment in which simple cooperating lineages of bacteria were propagated under a selective regime that rewarded collective-level persistence. Collectives reproduced via life cycles that either embraced, or purged, cheating types. When embraced, the life cycle alternated between phenotypic states. Selection fostered inception of a developmental switch that underpinned the emergence of collectives whose fitness, during the course of evolution, became decoupled from the fitness of constituent cells. Such development and decoupling did not occur when groups reproduced via a cheat-purging regime. Our findings capture key events in the evolution of Darwinian individuality during the transition from single cells to multicellularity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 133 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 531 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 18 3%
Germany 6 1%
France 6 1%
Brazil 5 <1%
United Kingdom 4 <1%
Japan 3 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
Netherlands 2 <1%
Other 10 2%
Unknown 473 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 129 24%
Researcher 111 21%
Student > Master 70 13%
Student > Bachelor 56 11%
Professor 32 6%
Other 95 18%
Unknown 38 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 296 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 76 14%
Physics and Astronomy 19 4%
Environmental Science 18 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 11 2%
Other 60 11%
Unknown 51 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 213. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2021.
All research outputs
#179,624
of 25,240,298 outputs
Outputs from Nature
#10,996
of 97,043 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,668
of 269,917 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature
#156
of 1,080 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,240,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 97,043 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 102.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,917 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,080 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.