| Title |
Shouldn't we care about the biology of benign tumours?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Reviews Cancer, October 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nrc3845 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Adrian Marino-Enriquez, Christopher D. M. Fletcher |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 19% |
| Researcher | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 10% |
| Professor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 19 | 23% |
| Unknown | 15 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 5 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2014.
All research outputs
#2,510,707
of 25,210,618 outputs
Outputs from Nature Reviews Cancer
#830
of 2,460 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,397
of 262,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Reviews Cancer
#16
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,210,618 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,460 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.