↓ Skip to main content

CALR and ASXL1 mutations-based molecular prognostication in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 570 patients

Overview of attention for article published in Leukemia, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
4 patents
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
244 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
154 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
CALR and ASXL1 mutations-based molecular prognostication in primary myelofibrosis: an international study of 570 patients
Published in
Leukemia, February 2014
DOI 10.1038/leu.2014.57
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Tefferi, P Guglielmelli, T L Lasho, G Rotunno, C Finke, C Mannarelli, A A Belachew, A Pancrazzi, E A Wassie, R P Ketterling, C A Hanson, A Pardanani, A M Vannucchi

Abstract

Current prognostication in primary myelofibrosis (PMF) is based on the dynamic international prognostic scoring system (DIPSS)-plus, which employs clinical and cytogenetic variables. We recently reported DIPSS-plus independent prognostic significance for calreticulin (CALR) (favorable) and ASXL1 (unfavorable) mutations. In the current study, 570 PMF patients were recruited for derivation (n=277) and validation (n=293) of a molecular prognostic model based on these two mutations. Survival was the longest in CALR(+)ASXL1(-) (median 10.4 years) and shortest in CALR(-)ASXL1(+) patients (median, 2.3 years; hazard ratio (HR), 5.9; 95% confidence interval (CI), 3.5-10.0). CALR(+)ASXL1(+) and CALR(-)ASXL1(-) patients had similar survival and were grouped together in an intermediate-risk category (median survival, 5.8 years; HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.0). The CALR/ASXL1 mutations-based prognostic model was DIPSS-plus independent (P<0.0001) and effective in identifying low-/intermediate-1-risk patients with shorter (median, 4 years) or longer (median 20 years) survival and high-/intermediate-2-risk patients with shorter (median, 2.3 years) survival. Multivariable analysis distinguished CALR(-)ASXL1(+) mutational status as the most significant risk factor for survival: HR 3.7 vs 2.8 for age >65 years vs 2.7 for unfavorable karyotype. These observations signify immediate clinical relevance and warrant i) CALR and ASXL1 mutation determination in all patients with PMF and ii) molecular revision of DIPSS-plus.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 154 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 151 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 17%
Other 23 15%
Researcher 18 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 32 21%
Unknown 32 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 73 47%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 <1%
Other 2 1%
Unknown 38 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 October 2022.
All research outputs
#4,955,145
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Leukemia
#1,536
of 5,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,415
of 315,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Leukemia
#23
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,213 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.